Endangered theories

Image via Wikipedia

Abstract
We use a field experiment to investigate whether race affects how responsive state legislators are to requests for help with registering to vote. In an email sent to each legislator, we randomized whether a putatively black or white alias was used and whether the email signaled the sender’s
partisan preference. Overall, we find that putatively black requests receive fewer replies. Weexplore two potential explanations for this discrimination: strategic partisan behavior and the legislators’ own race. We find that the putatively black alias continues to be differentially treated even when the emails signal partisanship, indicating that strategic considerations cannot
completely explain the observed differential treatment. Further analysis reveals that white legislators of both parties exhibit similar levels of discrimination against the black alias. Minority legislators do the opposite, responding more frequently to the black alias. Implications for the study of race and politics in the United States are discussed.

Link to the rest of the Study:http://butler.research.yale.edu/papers/AJPS_Discriminate.pdf

Related articles

• Do Politicians Discriminate Against Constituents? (politicalwire.com)
• Okla. House reprimands legislator for race remarks (lezrec29.wordpress.com)
• Why do people discriminate against each other in general (wiki.answers.com)
• New Law Makes It Illegal to Discriminate Against the Unemployed (narmer.wordpress.com)
• Hawaii law bars gender identity discrimination (hahayourefunny.wordpress.com)
• New Jersey prohibits job postings that discriminate against unemployed (justjobs.com)
• Special Interest Group Campaign Contributions Polarizing (youronevote.wordpress.com)